Inclusion, Equity and Elementary Education
For education to be truly inclusive and
equitable, a strong political will and greater efforts are required on part of
the government to ensure that all children are not just in school but receiving
an education which they can relate to, which represents their experiences and
enables them to make sense of their lives and things around them
Universalisation of Elementary Education (UEE) has been unequivocally accepted as an
objective in all countries which have still not been successful in bringing all
its school going children into the fold of a formal system of education. As an
integral part of ‘right to life’, a life of self-respect and dignity, ‘right
to education’ was recognised as a fundamental right by the Supreme Court
in 1993 itself (Unnikrishnan Vs State of Andhra Pradesh) but it took almost
16 years for the Constitution to be amended and the Right to Education to be
enacted as a justiciable right in 2009. Despite its limitations, one of which
is the most obvious exclusion of children under six and those above fourteen,
it needs to be celebrated and mechanisms put in place to ensure that all
children get good quality and meaningful education that they rightfully
deserve.
It must be noted that ‘inclusion and
equity’ have several meanings in the context of education- all children,
irrespective of their age, gender, region, religion, caste and class etc are
able to access education (complete school cycle) of a formal type as against a
part-time, short-term or non-formal education; all children receive an
equitable, uniform and good quality education and; there is adequate and proper
representation in the curriculum, syllabus and textbooks of the lives,
experiences and worldviews of children studying in those schools. While the
myriad meanings that ‘inclusion and equity’ imply are acknowledged by almost
everyone, there are still innumerable challenges in translating them into
reality. India on one hand revels in its rich geographical and cultural
diversity and on the other hand, moans its deeply divided and hierarchical
nature. With its multiple social contexts, a child has several identities and
not all of them are a matter of pride to him because of the social placing of
pegs (class, caste, gender, religion etc) onto which those identities are
hinged. For instance, being an upper class, upper-caste, urban male is
certainly considered to be superior to being a female, or belonging to a working
class, low caste or tribal. While it is well known that there are complex ways
in which these multiple identities actually interact with each other in real
lives of these children, what is disturbing is the perpetuation of these social
inequalities in the education system.
replica hermes